Be Informed About Neonicotinoids And Pollinators

beephoto4webAs most people in our industry are probably well aware by now, there has been a large and, at times, vocal concern raised over the use of neonicotinoids in the greenhouse industry and within all areas of agriculture. This concern revolves around three separate but somewhat related subjects: bee decline, colony collapse disorder and pollinator deaths due to both acute and chronic exposure to pesticides.

A brief review of the development and use of neonicotinoid products shows that these products were approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and first used in the mid 1990s. Through the introduction of these products, the pesticides that were replaced were not only less effective in many cases, but also potentially more dangerous to humans and the environment. The neonicotinoids are systemic materials that are absorbed by the plant and move through it to provide effective pest control. Studies have shown that when mixed and applied properly, these materials are safe to humans and pollinators.

Logically, as with all insecticides, these products are toxic to honeybees and other pollinators if not used properly. Directions by the manufacturer need to be followed correctly and all responsible steps taken to protect beneficial and non-targeted creatures from exposure to these products when applications are made. Furthermore, studies have shown these chemicals can be transferred into the pollen and nectar of treated plants. Pollinators, through the course of their contact with blooms on treated plants, can then be exposed to any tainted pollen and nectar.

Laboratory studies have shown that honeybees and bumble bees exposed to high sub-lethal levels of these products can experience problems flying, navigating, learning new tasks and experience reduced food consumption. But, if proper application rates are applied, no studies have shown acute or chronic toxicity to pollinators if levels were even detectable. To date, no effects have been observed in field studies with field realistic dosages. Also, to date field trials in comparison to laboratory studies have shown no negative effects from chronic exposure to neonicotinoids again when applied at recommended rates and application methods.

Where Does Our Industry Fit Into The Discussion?

The question before all of us now is, where does the commercial horticulture industry fit into the discussion of neonicotinoid use and its effect upon pollinators? Do the plants we grow for personal and commercial landscaping purposes in any way harm these creatures? It is again my hope that all applicators first read each pesticide label closely before treatments are made and then follow recommendations as listed. With correct use as listed by the manufacturer and approved by the EPA, we as growers can be both successful in our crop production and good stewards of our environment.

As I think about the possibility of actual chronic insecticide exposure to honeybees and other pollinators, I have a few questions. Can exposure to or ingestion of nectar and pollen from greenhouse-grown flowering plants treated with neonicotinoids harm pollinators? If so, why have only laboratory trials produced confirming results and not actual field trials?

Having owned two honeybee hives when I was younger, I have a fairly good background in the nature of honeybees. Recently I also conducted a quick search of bee facts. Here are some interesting facts that I would like to share:

• The average honeybee colony consists of 50,000 bees. Of that population, there is one queen, 50 to 100 drones (males) and the remainder of the population are the worker bees (non-fertile females).
• The queen lays 1,000 to 2,000 eggs per day to maintain the hives population of worker bees.
• The average life span of a worker bee is four to six weeks during spring/summer.
• On average, 2.5 million flower visits are required by honeybees to produce one pound of honey.
• The average honeybee hive produces 50 pounds of honey per year.
• The average honeybee harvest range in a nonagricultural setting is 2 miles.

After reviewing these facts, I have some compelling doubts about the impact any greenhouse-grown flowering plants treated with neonicotinoids may have on the overall health of honeybees. If we assume, and hope, the plants were treated properly with these materials at the greenhouse, and if any chemical was transferred to the pollen and nectar, it would be at very low, nonthreatening and EPA acceptable levels. Any direct or indirect exposure to these low, if present, levels would constitute a minimal, sub-lethal exposure that to date even controlled laboratory studies have shown little or no negative effect to the honeybee. Furthermore, considering the natural mortality rate of worker bees at approximately 17 to 20 percent per week in peak flight season, how much of an impact does any low level chronic exposure have upon the bees if such an effect were to even exist?

It has been written that any and all primary food sources for pollinators must be protected from chemical contamination. What constitutes a primary food source, 20 percent of overall hive food supply? If this is the case for honeybees, this figure would equal 10 pounds of honey produced, or the equivalent of 25 million flower visits, and all derived from harvesting nectar from within a 4 square mile urban or residential area. Now I would love to say that our industry is successful to such a point that the density of greenhouse grown and chemically treated plants were at such a density to supply 20 percent of the food needs to all pollinators, but I’m afraid reality does not support the math. Plus again, no studies have shown that responsible use of these products taint any potential food sources.

What’s Next?

Where do we go from here?

1) I believe our industry needs to unite and fund research to determine the actual effect, if any, that our greenhouse usage of neonicotinoid products has upon pollinators. This work needs to be conducted in the field, under actual urban and residential situations, and not solely under controlled laboratory conditions.

2) Trials need to be conducted, which reaffirm or adjust the recommended application rates for safe and effective pest protection from the use of these products.

3) All methods and timing of applications need to be studied to determine the safest and optimum techniques of usage. This is especially true in regard to drench applications.

4) Our industry needs to reach out to the environmental groups and express our sincere desire to seriously address this subject. We are all stewards of this earth and need to protect it.

5) When comprehensive facts are determined from actual field trials, we need to supply both the retailer and consumers with the studies facts and guidelines that have been determined for ensuring the safety of our environment.

6) We as an industry must diligently and consistently follow these guidelines for the safe and effective use of these products.

We are all in the business of growing and selling plants that improve the life experience of the citizens in our community. We must continue to offer plants to consumers which are of the quality and value that they have come to expect. But, we must also do so in a manner that does not harm our environment or the pollinators upon which our very food supply depends.

Topics:

Leave a Reply

5 comments on “Be Informed About Neonicotinoids And Pollinators

  1. Interesting take. Being in the horticulture industry since 1970, and a bee keeper for the last 27 years, not sure that we can say ‘not us’.

  2. Excellent piece. Growers or retailers that have stepped out and said we will sell neonic free product are not being straight with their customers unless they are growing 100% of their products. Try and get a FL flowering tropical that’s neonic free. The piece above talks about a responsible path. Greed, and praying on ill informed consumers that are headline readers only, is not a healthy place to be on this issue. Look for the real science that shows these chemicals are the problem – you won’t find it. Follow the Money – Enrich a few in particular organizations at the expense of tens of millions. Friends of the Earth announced a big win the last quarter of last year – $250,000 in new contributions to help administer save the bees… Typical. I’ve personally done a bunch of research around this, public domain. I’m no scientist, but then neither are the people that looked at 13 plants from 3 cities and created this nonsense. Our industry, as an important part of the AG community should know better than to try and benefit from this BS.

  3. I have personally been following this chemical for the last 5 years and if people will take the time to read the only studies that have been done, such as University of Northern Italy, there is strong evidence that these chemicals play a large role in the honey bee demise. I buy and sell these chemicals for a living and I am very familiar with them and the break-down action. This is one class of chemical that may cause damage for a very long time and has been banned for good reason in several European countries..

  4. Bees make honey. Honey is winter food. Honey is made from plant nectar. Honey lasts longer than individual bees, feeds the whole colony including new bees. Can you guarantee there are no.neonics in their honey? Also where are your references? There are several field studies that demonstrate long term chronic effects.

More From Crop Inputs...

April 17, 2015

Sakata Seed Uses California Spring Trials Display Plants To Give Back

Sakata Seed America is putting its post-CAST (California Spring Trials) plants and flowers to good use to support events in local California communities of Salinas and Morgan Hill. The plants, along with donations through Sakata's Charitable Giving Program, will support three fun-filled community events that promote healthy lifestyles and support the agricultural industry.

Read More
Hakonochloa macra Aureola v

April 17, 2015

Ornamental Grasses — A Few Thoughts

Grasses have been embraced by growers, landscape architects and retailers, and are an important component in wholesale and resale sales. Allan Armitage shares some popular grasses, one to avoid and a few to use with caution.

Read More
PW_CAST15

April 17, 2015

Allan Armitage’s Favorite Plants From Proven Winners, Syngenta And Danziger

Between visiting California Spring Trial giants like Proven Winners, Syngenta and Danziger, Allan Armitage saw a lot of great plants in one day. Despite the size of the challenge, Dr. Armitage finds a few favorites he thinks you should try.

Read More
Latest Stories

April 15, 2015

BASF’s Pageant Intrinsic Fungicide Registration A…

The state of California has approved the supplemental label registration of Pageant Intrinsic brand fungicide for disease control in the commercial production of greenhouse-grown tomatoes and tomato transplants for the home consumer market.

Read More
Egg card used for insect control in Parkway Garden’s retail area.

April 13, 2015

Biocontrols Use Requires Commitment

For some companies, a switch to biocontrols is an easy decision to make. Parkway Gardens of Ontario, Canada, began using biocontrols nine years ago after Erik Jacobsen, the company’s owner, wanted to expose Parkway, its customers and the environment to fewer pesticide products. “Many pesticides were increasingly ineffective, and in Canada, new product registration moves with glacial slowness,” Jacobsen says. “The labor cost of applying pesticides is much greater than using biocontrols.” In addition, it was also an opportunity to market the company’s eco-friendliness to a younger demographic, he says. In a Q & A with Greenhouse Grower, Jacobsen explains what biocontrols and methods have proved effective for Parkway Gardens Greenhouse Grower: In what types of greenhouse structures are you using biocontrols? Erik Jacobsen: Our greenhouses are all poly covered. About half the range is a Westbrook 14-foot at peak gutter-connected block, and the remaining half a mix of quonset-style […]

Read More

April 11, 2015

Lowe’s Announces Commitment To Phase Out Neonicotinoids…

Home improvement retailer Lowe’s companies announced April 9 that it has committed to eliminate neonicotinoid pesticides from its stores in a gradual phase-out over the next 48 months. In response, horticulture industry associations issued a statement that Lowe’s position is surprising, considering the most recent and positive reports on the state of honeybee health and recent peer reviewed research, and that this is an issue for which sound science must take priority.

Read More

April 9, 2015

Survey Snapshot Shows Biocontrols Mainstreaming

Have you incorporated biocontrols into your greenhouse operation? If so, you’ve got plenty of company. An anonymous online survey by Greenhouse Grower magazine in December 2014 of more than 156 ornamental plant and flower growers across the U.S. found 81 percent used biocontrols in 2014.

Read More

March 31, 2015

Manufacturers Are Taking Biologicals To The Next Level

Through acquisitions and new products, many crop protection companies are making firm commitments to the future of the biocontrols industry.

Read More
OxiPhos_BioSafe2

March 23, 2015

BioSafe Makes Label Changes To OxiPhos And ZeroTol 2.0

There have been some recent label changes made to the BioSafe Systems product OxiPhos, a systemic bactericide/fungicide that reduces downy mildew spores when tank mixed with ZeroTol 2.0.

Read More
Nufarm_logo

March 23, 2015

Nufarm Fungicides Now Registered For Use On Edible Crop…

Nufarm Americas announced label expansions for two of its fungicides that will provide more pest management options for the ornamental industry. The Cleary 3336 F and EG fungicides are now registered for use across a wider range of edible crops, including select greenhouse vegetables and transplants, herbs and backyard fruit.

Read More
ColeusDMLeafSporulation_Daughtrey

March 11, 2015

Research Gives Clues For Preventing Coleus Downy Mildew

Maintaining awareness of coleus downy mildew is more important than ever to safeguard these attractive plants for reliable garden performance.

Read More
Rose Rosette on Knockout rose, May 2013. Photo credit: Alan Windham, University of Tennessee

March 2, 2015

Rose Rosette Disease Fight Gets A Boost From Government…

In 2014, $4.6 million was awarded through the Farm Bill to tackle rose rosette disease, a devastating pathogen that affects one of the industry’s most important crops.

Read More
Fig 1 Leafy Gall On Leucanthemum Becky

March 2, 2015

How To Prevent Leafy Gall Before You Lose Plants

Leafy gall is a nasty disease that can go undetected until plant damage is done. Take these steps to protect your crops from infection.

Read More

February 17, 2015

A New Look At Biological Control: Can Plants Affect The…

The success of a biological control program depends on a number of factors including quality of natural enemies, timing of release, release rates and environmental conditions. However, what is typically not taken into consideration is how plants can affect the performance of natural enemies, including attack rate and searching ability. Biological control agents work hard to protect plants, but plants have ways to help themselves, too.

Read More

February 1, 2015

New Pest Control Products For Your Toolbox

Add one of these new insecticides to your IPM program for successful pest control.

Read More
IR-4_profile_Feb2015

January 29, 2015

IR-4: A Pest Management Resource For Growers

Almost 40 years ago, IR-4 (Interregional Research Project Number 4) began serving the ornamental horticulture industry, helping to facilitate the registration of pest management tools. IR-4 does this primarily by surveying growers about their pest management issues and then hosting workshops to review survey results and set priorities for the coming years. Most recently, IR-4 coordinated a meeting of researchers and industry members on pollinator health and neonicotinoid chemistries to start a discussion on the needed research. The next step will be to get the outcomes from that workshop out to the public.

Read More

January 28, 2015

Biocontrols 2015 Conference & Tradeshow: Peace Tree…

Lloyd Traven, a speaker at the upcoming Biocontrols 2015 Conference & Tradeshow, was one of the industry’s early adopters of biocontrols in the greenhouse. Traven, owner of Peace Tree Farm, is evangelical about the technology as an effective tool for resistance management, as well as improved plant quality that contributes to a grower’s bottom line.

Read More

January 27, 2015

Southwest Perennials Improves Production, Shortens Crop…

A father-and-son team find LEDs deliver a higher rooting rate for cuttings propagated under the lights.

Read More
Wainwright-web-620x349

January 22, 2015

Quality Control With Biocontrols

Make sure the shipment of beneficials that just arrived is viable and ready to go to work in your greenhouse, nursery, or field. Here are five steps you can take to ensure success with your biocontrols.

Read More

January 9, 2015

6 New Fertilizer Products For Healthy Plants

These five products add even more options for delivering nutrients to the root zone.

Read More

January 7, 2015

Fertilizers And The Future

As growers look for new ways to cut costs and conserve resources, fertilizer and equipment companies are offering products that strive to save water, reduce toxic runoff and keep chemicals out of the equation.

Read More