When Fertilizing, Don’t Neglect The Root Zone

Controlled release series sponsors

Bedding and potted plants are traditionally fertilized daily or several times a week with water soluble fertilizer (WSF) applied in the irrigation water. With WSF, the fertilizer components are in a form that can be directly absorbed by the plant. This also means the fertilizer components can immediately impact the soluble salts and the pH of the substrate. WSF are also in a form that can readily be leached from the root zone.

When using controlled-release fertilizers (CRF) the nutrients are primarily held within the CRF prills and are not available for plant absorption until they are released slowly over time. Thus, when a CRF is added to the substrate, its effects on pH and salts are not immediate. Instead, they occur slowly over time as nutrients diffuse from the prills. Use the results from three studies to better manage the root-zone pH and electrical conductivity (EC) when using CRFs.

Both Fertilizer Treatments Affect Root Zone EC And pH

The EC guidelines that are widely used by the greenhouse industry were developed for WSFs. Following these guidelines, a Pour Thru EC of 1.0 to 2.6 milliSiemens per centimeter (mS/cm) is desirable to supply adequate fertility for low-to-medium vigor bedding plants. For heavy feeding plants such as poinsettias, garden mums and vigorous petunias, an
EC of 2.6 to 4.6 mS/cm is desirable.

Methods for conducting each experiment are described in the sidebars on the following page. In the poinsettia experiment, the WSF treatment resulted in an EC within 3.5 to 4.5 mS/cm for most of the crop period. By the end of the experiment when plants were absorbing less nutrients, EC rose to potentially harmful levels in the WSF treatment. For CRF, the EC values were always below 2.6 mS/cm, and for the lower application rates, these were always below 1.0.

‘Peterstar Red’ poinsettias fertilized with WSF were about the same size as those receiving 6 lbs./yd³ or more CRF. Plants receiving 4 lbs./yd³ CRF were a bit smaller. For ‘Prestige Red,’ 10 lbs./yd³ was required to equal the size of liquid-fed plants, and lower amounts led to a smaller plant. The recommended substrate pH for poinsettia is between 5.5 and 6.5; this ensures that nutrients are soluble and readily available. The pH of plants irrigated with WSF was within the recommended range throughout the experiment, whereas for all CRF treatments substrate pH quickly rose above 6.5 and remained there for the rest of the experiment.

In the bedding plant experiment, petunia, a moderately heavy feeder, with 200 ppm N from WSF produced the largest plants. The other treatments, including the 100 ppm N WSF, produced markedly smaller plants. Lantana and coleus are less vigorous feeders and responded well to CRF. For these two species, 8 lbs./yd³ CRF produced plants as large as the 200 ppm N WSF treatment. Plants irrigated with 100 ppm N WSF or 6 lbs./yd³ were intermediate-sized, and lower application rates of CRF (2 or 4 pounds) led to somewhat smaller plants.

During the six-week trial, only plants irrigated with 200 ppm N WSF had a pH of 6.5 or lower. This is due to the moderately acidic nature of 21-5-20 fertilizer. Neither the 100 ppm N WSF nor any of the CRF treatments supplied enough acidic nitrogen to keep pH less than 6.5. The EC of the WSF treatments was within the 1.0 to 2.6 mS/cm range, which is optimum for most bedding plants. In contrast, the CRF treatments had nearly constant EC, which varied from 0.4-0.6 mS/cm. In terms of nutrient leaching, CRFs are superior to WSF. CRFs leached 5 to 10 times less nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium than the WSF counterparts.

In the propagation experiment, one week after sticking cuttings there was little difference in both substrate pH and EC across our different fertilizer treatments. As time in propagation passed, the fertilizers had a greater impact on both pH and EC. Both CRF and WSF decreased pH and increased EC, although the amount of CRF incorporated affected the degree of influence. By mixing the CRF into the propagation substrate the day before sticking cuttings, the effect of CRF incorporation was negligible at first and increased over time. The release pattern of nutrients from CRF prills corresponds well to adventitious root development in cuttings, with a greater demand for nutrients as roots develop. This suggests that CRFs may be a valuable tool for cutting propagation.

Monitor EC And pH Regularly To Ensure Success

In our trials we found that EC guidelines for WSF cannot be directly extended to CRF. Because CRFs are slow-release fertilizer sources, the EC values we measured were much lower as compared to WSF. For CRF, however, a low EC does not necessarily indicate that the fertility level is insufficient for optimum plant growth. For example, the growth of ‘Peterstar Red’ poinsettia receiving 6 lbs./yd³ CRF was similar to plants receiving 250 ppm N WSF. Yet, Pour Thru EC averaged 0.8 for CRF and 4.2 for WSF.

Monitoring EC is still important when using CRF. A stable EC indicates that nutrient release is in sync with plant needs. Excessively high EC, greater than 4.5 mS/cm, indicates that fertilizer salts are building up in the substrate and this can lead to plant damage from salt burn. Symptoms include death of root tips (which can provide an entry point to root diseases), wilting due to the inability to absorb enough water and browning of lower leaf edges as salts build up to harmful levels in the leaves.

With CRFs, a high EC may indicate that fertilizer release is greater than the plant needs, although this is not common. More commonly, high EC is found when hot growing temperatures cause a rapid release of nutrients from the fertilizer prill.

A high EC can also occur when CRF is incorporated into a substrate and held for a long time (more than two to four weeks) before transplanting, which leads to a release of fertilizer salts before the substrate is used. These cases illustrate the need to periodically measure EC when using CRF, especially during hot temperatures. Regardless of the cause of high EC, the remedy is the same — drench the substrate thoroughly with clear water to leach out excess salts. Monitor EC and repeat leaching as necessary.

Growers should also periodically measure pH when using CRFs. CRFs were more likely to result in plants with a high substrate pH than a moderately acidic WSF (21-5-20). When switching to CRFs, growers may find they need to be more proactive with pH control. To lower pH, sulfuric, phosphoric or nitric acids can be added to acidify the irrigation water or use periodic drenches with an acidic WSF (such as 21-7-7). More information on monitoring and adjusting root-zone pH is available at Greenhouse.cornell.edu and Flowers.hort.purdue.edu

CRFs can be a great tool to have in your fertilizer tool kit to reduce runoff of nutrients into the environment or to reduce the labor associated with mixing and applying WSF. Just don’t lose sight of the details. Continue to monitor pH and EC and adjust growing practices when necessary to keep these in check.

Leave a Reply

More From Fertilization...
Roots with plant media background XL-W

July 2, 2016

University Of Florida Offering Online Nutrient Management Course In July

Topics include common nutrient problems, essential nutrients, fertilizer types, how to interpret a fertilizer label, managing total nutrient level, pH, and EC, onsite testing, and growing media.

Read More
Agro-K

May 19, 2016

Agro-K Expands Distribution In New England Through Partnership With Northeast Agricultural Sales

Agro-K, which manufactures conventional and organic foliar plant nutrients, will distribute its full line of foliar fertilizers and soil biological products through NEAG.

Read More
Fertilizer Rates Feature Image

January 29, 2016

Bioworks Releases New Higher Nitrogen Fertilizer For Ornamental Crops

Verdanta N-Vita 9-4-3 promotes foliar growth and features a slow release process, making nutrients available for a longer period of time.

Read More
Latest Stories
Roots with plant media background XL-W

July 2, 2016

University Of Florida Offering Online Nutrient Manageme…

Topics include common nutrient problems, essential nutrients, fertilizer types, how to interpret a fertilizer label, managing total nutrient level, pH, and EC, onsite testing, and growing media.

Read More
Agro-K

May 19, 2016

Agro-K Expands Distribution In New England Through Part…

Agro-K, which manufactures conventional and organic foliar plant nutrients, will distribute its full line of foliar fertilizers and soil biological products through NEAG.

Read More
Fertilizer Rates Feature Image

January 29, 2016

Bioworks Releases New Higher Nitrogen Fertilizer For Or…

Verdanta N-Vita 9-4-3 promotes foliar growth and features a slow release process, making nutrients available for a longer period of time.

Read More
Primrose Downward Leaf Roll From Calcium Deficiency

January 11, 2016

How Calcium Plays A Critical Role In Plant Health

Supply vegetables and poinsettias with a healthy amount of calcium to avoid tip and leaf burn.

Read More
Sustane Research Greenhouse 2015

January 7, 2016

Fertilizer Manufacturers Aim To Deliver Sustainable Sol…

Industry experts discuss the latest trends to help ensure 2016 is your best year yet.

Read More
Fertilizer Rates Feature Image

August 12, 2015

Selecting Fertilizer Rates For Several Spring Bedding P…

Fertilizing bedding plants can be difficult due to the differing needs of the large variety of plants that we grow. Many operations do not grow enough of any one crop to cater the fertilizer specifically for each crop. Therefore, grouping crops with similar fertilizer requirements and having two to three fertilizer strengths available is a practical way to ensure plants are getting the fertilizer they need. With many new plant varieties on the market, we wanted to conduct a trial at Cornell University to determine best fertilizer rates for several common bedding plant crops. 22 Bedding Plants Studied To Establish Fertilizer Rates Plugs and rooted liners of 22 crops (Table 1) were transplanted into 4-inch (500 mL volume) round pots with a commercial peat/perlite based substrate. The plants were grown in a glass greenhouse at Cornell University during the spring season at a spacing of one plant per square foot. Heating set […]

Read More
NSOrganicPlantFood3-1-1_featured

June 13, 2015

UMASS Fertilizer Trials Recommend Nature’s Source Organ…

In a recent online fact-sheet at its Extension website, the UMass Amherst Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment lists Nature’s Source Organic Plant Food 3-1-1 as “the best liquid organic fertilizer,” according to Dr. Douglas Cox, Stockbridge School of Agriculture. It is called-out by the Extension after a number of years of studying the use of organic fertilizers for growing commercial greenhouse crops. The trials evaluated traditional water soluble and granular slow-release chemical fertilizers. Dr. Cox recommends Nature’s Source Organic Plant Food 3-1-1 as a liquid fertilizer that is readily available, cost effective, OMRI-listed and with good label directions for greenhouses. He also mentions the ease-of-use in how it mixes well with water and can pass fertilizer injectors. “Nature’s Source is currently the best liquid organic fertilizer,” Cox wrote in his article “Organic Fertilizers – Thoughts on Using Liquid Organic Fertilizers for Greenhouse Plants,” “I have seen no foliar chlorosis yet with this fertilizer. Nature’s source is widely available and a great […]

Read More

January 9, 2015

6 New Fertilizer Products For Healthy Plants

These five products add even more options for delivering nutrients to the root zone.

Read More

January 7, 2015

Fertilizers And The Future

As growers look for new ways to cut costs and conserve resources, fertilizer and equipment companies are offering products that strive to save water, reduce toxic runoff and keep chemicals out of the equation.

Read More

December 31, 2014

Gain Greater Control Of Fertilizer With Automated Ferti…

University researchers look at integrating irrigation and fertilization with the help of water sensors to reduce fertilizer treatments and improve application timing.

Read More

October 30, 2014

Basics & Beyond: Comparing Substrate Fertilizer Ame…

Cornell University researcher determines if substrate-incorporated slow-release fertilizers can be used to replace or reduce the need for liquid fertilizer for four spring crops.

Read More

July 24, 2014

Using Controlled Release Fertilizers To Produce Garden …

Researchers determined whether or not garden mums can be grown with controlled-release fertilizer, and if it reduces fertilizer leaching, as compared with water-soluble fertilizers.

Read More

March 14, 2014

New Foliage Pro Fertilizer Offers Complete Nutrition Pl…

Dyna-Gro Nutrition Solutions has developed a process it says is capable of keeping all 16 essential plant nutrients in solution form.

Read More

January 30, 2014

OASIS Grower Solutions Introduces New One-Bag Hydroponi…

The new 16-4-17 Hydroponic Fertilizer from OASIS Grower Solutions (OGS) is a one-bag solution that replaces two-part systems traditionally used by commercial hydroponic growers. It is specifically formulated for commercial hydroponic production of lettuce, herbs and vegetables.

Read More

December 30, 2013

Fertilizer Changes Growing Mix pH

When considering a fertilizer's influence on media pH, you need to know its acid or basic reaction.

Read More

December 30, 2013

Basics & Beyond: Fundamentals Of Phosphorus Nutriti…

Phosphorus is an essential element, after all.

Read More
Everris Liquid S.T.E.M.

December 30, 2013

New Fertilizers For 2014

New fertilizer products not only deliver optimum nutrition, they also provide for easier application and increased efficiency. Check out these new products to help your operation produce a healthy crop in 2014. Click through on the pages below.

Read More

December 18, 2013

Focus On Fertilizer: Micronutrients And Organics

New fertilizer products are focusing on micronutrients and providing efficient options for organic production.

Read More
[gravityform id="35" title="false" description="false"]