RSS Feeds

Home > Viewpoints > Allan Armitage

Allan Armitage

Tips Of The Trade

Throwing Out The Wine Before It's Time 

The industry discards new varieties before consumers have a chance to get acclimated to them. 

Contributing Editor

We discard varieties too soon.

Such was the sentiment of Geoff Needham, president of PlantHaven and a man I am pleased to call my friend. Geoff has been introducing new varieties for many years. In fact, his company was created to work with breeders to help promote and distribute their new crops.

Geoff can explain in detail the good things and the not-so-good things about the patent system, licensing and the status of plant breeders’ rights in America and Europe. In other words, he knows the mechanics of new crop introduction as well as anyone in this business, and I consider his comment quite telling.

Only two columns ago (“The New Plant Dilemma: Too Many Everythings,” April 2010), I wrote that there were too many crops in our business – too many cultivars of petunia and verbena and heuchera and too few consumers to sustain the rush toward more, more and more.

I stated that I understood why we as an industry felt we needed to have more. Perhaps I was just frustrated at having to learn another 50 new cultivars of calibrachoa again this season, as I had to do last season. There was just something not right. The industry was feeling like a Tokyo subway car at rush hour, with more and more varieties being squeezed in.

More New Equals Confusion

My comments about too many varieties were focused on the fact that too much “new” made the buying experience more confusing and difficult. Geoff’s comment, however, points out the logical consequence of too much “new” equaled too little “old.”

In a business now predicated on promotion and advertising dollars, it makes sense that those dollars aren’t going to be spent on something old. In our rush to cram in new cultivars, older ones have to go. This is logical, except that the definition of “old” means something very different to a breeding company compared to 99 percent of consumers, from retailer to gardener.

While we think anything more than two years is old, it usually takes twice that long for information about that new cultivars to get down to the user level. And by that time those cultivars are on the chopping block.

A new double bacopa may be really neat to those who bred it. But good grief, retailers are still trying to find creative ways to sell any bacopa.

Have you tried to find an old-fashioned purple coneflower lately? Those are the ones that everyone’s daughters are successful with, but while yellow, orange and strawberry coneflowers are everywhere, the purples are considered boring and don’t get the shelf space anymore.

I am by no means upset with the surge in new cultivars in the last 10 years. I revel in it – heck, I introduced a bunch of them myself. New crops are still the lifeblood of this industry. But we must be careful throwing out the wine before it’s time. Even though the consumer is probably the least important person in determining which plants are introduced, let’s give them a chance to learn about them before we stick something else in their faces. 

Related Articles:

Comments:

Submitted by: Anonymous
June 9, 2010
As a 25+ year veteran sales rep for a seed/plant/plug broker, I agree that the lifespan of new varieties has become ridiculously short. In my experience, plug producers in particular are all too quick to jump on a highly marketed new variety or series, but frequently it is at the expense of last year's new introductions, which my plug customers have just now grown for the first time this spring. Whether they (and their customers, the consumer) like the variety or not, there is a good chance they will not be able to obtain plugs of it next season. Another side of this, Allan, is that if you and I have trouble keeping up with varieties, with our many years of experience in the trade, I can only imagine that the consumer will remember precious few variety names from year to year. They may, however, remember the brand name, and perhaps that is all that matters to the breeder-producer - to leave more of a "brand" impression rather than to promote specific cultivars that can and do change rapidly.
Submitted by: Denise Wadsworth
June 9, 2010
I agree with Mr. Armitage. New introductions are are necessary, a 'necessary evil' to some. 'New' sparks interest and allows the consumer ~ variety. However, we must also allow room for the tried-and-true varieties of plant families that are embedded in our 'green hearts' and 'fond memories'. There still needs to be quality sources for 'favorite plants' that have sustained the test of time. Something like a 'purple coneflower' may become thought of as 'less-than-desirable' and thus labeled 'an heirloom' which for some folks, translates to, 'a discard'. Make new friends, but keep the old, for one is silver and the other is gold!
Submitted by: Paul Westervelt
June 9, 2010
I'm a little surprised by all of this - maybe our market is different. We grow and happily sell brand new, classic, and old but unknown plants side by side all the time. I'd be a fool to discontinue Palace Purple in favor of the hottest new Heuchera when I can sell both. For us, Palace Purple sells circles around any other single Heuchera cultivar, but the new cultivars combined sell circles around Palace Purple. If I give up either, I'm giving away sales. As for plug vendors hopping on the next new thing at the expense of last year's new varieties, I've very rarely had a plug vendor turn down an order for something that was booked in advance. On the occasions that they do, it's not hard to find someone else willing to pick up their business as long as I'm willing to prebook. Anonymous has 4x the experience in this industry that I have, but I'm not seeing those problems. Maybe I just have better vendors. For me, the real issue is that some of the new is crap and that's why I love trials. Vendors and breeders who sell weak genetics for the sake of a quick buck lose all credibility with me. Thank you Dr. A (and every other trial director who does it) for putting the breeder on the trial bed sign - I keep an eye on that.
Submitted by: Carolyn Whetman
June 12, 2010
Sir I agree with your sentiment regarding the discarding of varieties new to market before the consumer has had a chance to get really turned on by them. I have always thought that the true merit and appreciation of a new introduction comes with the gardener talking to a fellow gardener over the fence – and commending the performance of a particular new plant. There’s nothing like the value of ‘word of mouth’ recommendation. But that takes time. The pressure on plant breeders, who take many years to develop a new plant, to satisfy buyers’ avaricious demands to produce new varieties on an annual basis devalues the time, dedication and investment involved in their creation. Would you want to replace the Mona Lisa every year? I don’t think so. Yours faithfully Carolyn Whetman Managing Director Whetman Pinks Ltd Devon EX7 0QP UK www.whetmanpinks.com carolyn@whetmanpinks.com

Leave a comment: (All fields are required)

Email: (Will not be displayed)
Name:
Comment:
Enter this
code into
the textbox:
7100

This field is present to prevent automated submission systems. If you see it, please do not fill in a value.

Meister Media Logo