Getting Results

When great minds think alike, great things happen. The new Plant Trials Database is an example. Launched just last year, the goal is to consolidate information from the many trial gardens across the U.S. in a database that can be easily viewed and analyzed.

The brainchild of three industry leaders: Allan Armitage, Greenhouse Grower columnist and professor emeritus of horticulture at the University of Georgia, Diane Blazek, executive director of All-America Selections (AAS) and Timothy Howard, president of Clarity Connect — the development of the database is a solution to a need for consistency and easy access to information on trials results.

While not yet available to growers, the database allows breeders and trial managers to quickly see results from multiple trials and evaluate varieties.

“I had been wanting to do something where plants trialed in different locations can be easily viewed by anyone — certainly the breeders who pay money to get plants in the trials and by other trial gardens who might be interested,” Armitage says. “A number of years ago I talked to a couple of people in the South — in Tennessee and Dallas — and said, ‘Let’s just put our links on each other’s sites.’ We did that for awhile, but it never went any further. But about a year and a half ago, we said, ‘It’s time to really do this.’ So I started writing some people to find out what we could do to really get this going.”

Armitage found out he wasn’t the only one who saw the need. “Diane Blazek wrote me and said, ‘Someone told me you’re interested in doing a national trials site. It turns out we’re talking about that also at AAS.’ So we decided to do it together,” he says.

Blazek, who had begun working on the database idea in response to breeders who had asked for it at a meeting earlier that year, says, “That’s what I love about this industry — instead of competing, we said there was no need to make more than one — we’ll just work together.”

Connecting AAS to the project seemed natural, Blazek says. “Somebody needed to manage the program, and we’re the neutral party,” she says. “Our breeders were telling us to do this. We’re here to serve the industry, so for me, I just felt this was a very important role for us to play. We have relationships with so many of the trial gardens already, so that was also an easy step.”

Howard’s company, Clarity Connect, develops websites for the green industry, and he was asked to help design and construct the site.Functionality and consistency of presentation were of prime importance. The dozens of trial gardens provide their information in many different formats, including websites, Excel spreadsheets, downloadable PDFs, Word documents, etc., which was one issue. Another is
that some gardens collect data twice during the season, and some collect it three times. The types of information collected also may vary.

“We wanted a breeder to be able to get in and see how a variety did in multiple locations and make it easy for them,” Howard says.

How It Works

A trial garden gives a rating from zero to five for each plant. “Zero is dead and five is fabulous,” Armitage says. “This way, if a breeder sees that the plant was a five in Georgia and a two in Minnesota, maybe it’s a better plant for the South.”

Each plant’s ratings are averaged as well, so it is easy to see how it performed overall.

The Plant Trials Database is not intended to replace the individual trial gardens’
reports and websites.

“We’re starting with basic information and continuing to grow it,” says Blazek. “We’re not saying this is the only site and you’ll never have to refer to the other reports anymore. But it’s a good quick view, and you can make comparisons on the site.”
The websites of all the participating trial gardens are included on the Plant Trials Database, so it is easy to find more detailed information.

Blazek says they wanted to make it as easy as possible for trial managers, but sometimes participating in the database required some adjustments, such as changing their rating scale in order to be consistent with ratings from the other trials.
Another issue was making sure the names of plants were entered correctly, as Begonia boliviensis ‘Santa Cruz Sunset’ would not be recognized by the computer as being the same as Begonia ‘Santa Cruz Sunset.’ To maintain consistency, only breeders can enter the names of the plants.

Breeders Get Behind The Idea

“We have a pretty good list of breeders participating — we have most of the major players now,” Howard says.

Breeders pay $3,000 to sign up and then $1,200 per year after that. The money is used to support website development, and Armitage says ultimately he would like to see some go back to the trial gardens. A company can submit one variety or 500, but they should be plants that are actually being tested at one or more of the trial garden locations.

“I would think, given the cost, even if you’re not one of the major breeders, if you have 10 or 15 new plants it would be money well spent,” Howard says. “By submitting your plants, if you send them to 15 different trial locations, you can get consolidated reports.”

Currently, only breeders and trial garden managers can log on and access the database, but that may eventually change.
“We will discuss in year two and beyond what other audience would benefit from accessing the trial results,” Howard says.

Because the database has only been in use for a year, Howard says they have been listening carefully to users and tweaking as needed.

“Originally, we didn’t think of adding how it was grown,” he says. “But now we’ve added a ‘where planted’ category.  In other words, is it in the ground, or a container or a hanging basket. People need to be able to understand the difference between those. I want to schedule a follow-up webinar with breeders and trial garden managers to look at the pros and cons of this year and what needs to be done next year,” Howard says.

“We’re going to try to get more breeders and trial gardens to participate and continue to build it and make it more robust and available,” Blazek says. “We want to grow it, expand it and listen to both the breeders and the trial managers at this point. When the actual number of users starts to expand, we’ll listen to them and continue to make it something that will be very useful to different segments of the industry.”                                                                                             GG

Leave a Reply

More From Variety Trials...
MSU-Annual-Trial-Garden

November 29, 2017

2017 Michigan State University Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI.

Read More
MOBOT-Trial-Gardens

November 27, 2017

2017 Missouri Botanical Garden Field Trial Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for the Missouri Botanical Garden in St. Louis, MO.

Read More
ISU-Trial-Beds

November 26, 2017

2017 Iowa State University/Reiman Gardens Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trials results for Iowa State University/Reiman Gardens in Ames, IA.

Read More
Latest Stories
MSU-Annual-Trial-Garden

November 29, 2017

2017 Michigan State University Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI.

Read More
MOBOT-Trial-Gardens

November 27, 2017

2017 Missouri Botanical Garden Field Trial Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for the Missouri Botanical Garden in St. Louis, MO.

Read More
ISU-Trial-Beds

November 26, 2017

2017 Iowa State University/Reiman Gardens Field Trials …

Check out the 2017 field trials results for Iowa State University/Reiman Gardens in Ames, IA.

Read More
Lucas Greenhouses 2017 Container Trials

November 25, 2017

2017 Lucas Greenhouses Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results from Lucas Greenhouses in Monroeville, NJ.

Read More
Upper-garden_Mast-Young

November 24, 2017

2017 Mast Young Plants Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results from Mast Young Plants in Grand Rapids, MI.

Read More
Pentas-Graffitti-Lipstick

November 23, 2017

2017 Dallas Arboretum Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trials results for Dallas Arboretum in Dallas, TX.

Read More
Pentas-Lucky-Star-Red

November 22, 2017

2017 Louisiana State University Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trials results Louisiana State University in Hammond, LA.

Read More
Echeveria-First-Lady

November 21, 2017

2017 D.S. Cole Growers Field Trial Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for D.S. Cole Growers in Loudon, NH.

Read More
Millet-Copper-Prince

November 20, 2017

2017 Colorado State University Field Trial Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for Colorado State University in Fort Collins, CO.

Read More
Achillea-Ritzy-Ruby

November 19, 2017

2017 Green Leaf Plants Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trials results for Green Leaf Plants in Lancaster, PA.

Read More
Ball-Bed-with-Midnight-Snack-tomato_Cornell

November 18, 2017

2017 Cornell University Field Trials Results

Check out the 2017 field trials results for Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.

Read More
Pennisetum glaucum 'Copper Prince'

November 13, 2017

Top Performing Plant Varieties from 2017 Field Trials

See some of plant varieties that made top performer lists in 2017 field trials across the country.

Read More
Sakata-Trial-at-Clemson-1

November 10, 2017

A Quick Look at Sakata’s Clemson Landscape Trial

For the first time, Sakata Ornamentals hosted a 2017 Southern Garden Tour trial stop at Clemson University.

Read More

November 8, 2017

2017 Metrolina Greenhouses Field Trial Results

Check out the 2017 field trial results for Metrolina Greenhouses in Huntersville, NC.

Read More
Youngs-Plant-Farm-Themed-Plant-Beds

November 8, 2017

How Young’s Plant Farm Uses Its Trial Gardens to …

The purpose of the trial gardens is to ensure that Young’s is consistently bringing the right product to the marketplace, so consumers will continue to be successful.

Read More
Metrolina-Home-Garden-Panel-feature

November 6, 2017

Metrolina Shows Off Its Summer Best During Southern Gar…

This summer’s Southern grower trials experienced unseasonably cool weather, but the plants still thrived. Consumer panels topped off the week, providing valuable insight for suppliers, growers, and their retail customers.

Read More

September 27, 2017

New Mum Intros From California Spring Trials 2017

For fall gardening product selection, you can't go wrong with offering mums. Here are a few of the new introductions that we saw at California Spring Trials 2017 that will be making their retail debut in 2018.

Read More

August 7, 2017

Standout Plants from the 2017 Ohio State University Fie…

Cultivate'17 attendees had a chance to visit the annual and container trials at The Ohio State University to see how some of the newest plant introductions are performing. Here's some of the new plants that stood out.

Read More