Groundbreaking Research Targets Energy Efficiency in Cannabis Cultivation

dartmouth student cannabis SCC Web Rocky Mountain Institute

Photo: Sustainable Cannabis Coalition

Dartmouth’s Thayer School of Engineering and Arthur L. Irving Institute for Energy and Society have announced the results of a first-ever independent study on energy efficiency in the cannabis industry. The study was sponsored by the Sustainable Cannabis Coalition (SCC) and supported by Rocky Mountain Institute and seasoned building science engineers. The results were based on data collected from MariMed Inc., a leading multi-state cannabis operator based in Norwood, MA, and Culta, a Maryland-based vertically integrated seed-to-sale cannabis company offering indoor and outdoor-grown cannabis and accessories.

Advertisement

A team of six senior engineering students conducted research through the Cook Engineering Design Center (CEDC) at Dartmouth over a six-month period during the 2021–22 academic year, adopting a whole system approach to meet plant and grower needs by focusing on yield per unit of energy, cost, and carbon emission. The research will ultimately provide regulators and industry operators with key insights into how the cannabis industry can meet climate, grid, and energy goals while improving business operations and cost targets.

“This research provides an independent, fact-based analysis of the enormous potential for the cannabis industry to reduce both capital and operating costs while improving key metrics like grams of product per kilowatt hour of energy and grams of product per grams of CO2 emission,” says Dr. Stephen Doig, Senior Research and Strategy Advisor at the Irving Institute.

The students adapted methodology pioneered at Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) by understanding the key needs of the plants (light, temperature, vapor pressure deficit, and water) for optimal production. They also took into consideration that plant needs change over the growth cycle and that heating and humidity loads can vary by 10-fold across the day-night cycle. The team explored active and passive options to meet those needs dynamically and grounded their analysis by fully metering grow lights, humidity, and temperature control systems.

Top Articles
Registration Now Open for the 15th Annual Darwin Perennials Day

The study yielded significant results, including:

  • Under optimal minimum conditions, HVAC systems can reduce fan energy by 50% during the light cycle and 90% during the dark cycle especially if a displacement ventilation approach to humidity control is adopted.
  • Using the best LED lights can reduce cooling needs by 10% compared to average LEDs and by more than 30% compared to HPS.
  • The students also demonstrated that using air-side economizers (free outdoor air cooling) could further reduce mechanical cooling needs by an additional 40+% depending on facility location. Free cooling is a standard practice in the building industry today (and code in many states).

“Regulators and grid operators should applaud the results since widespread industry adoption will lower peak demand on the grid and provide guidance on key metrics to compare operators across the industry,” Doig says.

To allay fears of contamination from the outdoors, the students pointed out that industries highly sensitive to contamination like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors use filtration to manage contamination levels. While the study did not address capital costs in detail, the results suggest that growers who adopt an optimal minimum approach will save capital as well as operating costs since HVAC systems will be smaller and/or there will be fewer of them for the same yields.

“We were incredibly impressed by the knowledge, passion, and commitment of the Dartmouth students and faculty involved in the study, and thankful for the opportunity to participate,” says Tim Shaw, COO of MariMed. “As a company committed to improving people’s lives every day, we take our responsibility to help create a cleaner environment very seriously. Implementing Dartmouth’s recommendation to redesign cooling and dehumidification implementation and to install even higher-efficiency LED lighting in our facilities is just one of many initiatives we are considering as part of our sustainability efforts at MariMed.”

The Sustainable Cannabis Coalition in partnership with RMI, Dartmouth, and other key industry players intends to conduct further research in the 2022–23 academic year.

“Based on the success of this initiative, we are looking forward to extending the work with Dartmouth into additional new-build opportunities, retrofits, and developing consistent industry metrics for energy efficiency and GHG’s,” says Shawn Cooney, co-founder of the SCC. “Our members are eager to participate in the process of standardizing the way our industry approaches its use of resources. We need to measure our usage of scarce resources across all phases of our product’s life cycles.”

SCC members and partners, Culta, Byers Scientific, Anderson Porter Design, Valiant, Sustain.Life, Fluence, and Inspire also participated in the research, providing additional information to the Dartmouth team.

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for M. Wolf Segal aka THe Farmer in the Sky M. Wolf Segal aka THe Farmer in the Sky says:

Despite the extremely heavy lean into LEDs that the regulated cannabis industry has taken, even the best LEDs currently offered are NOT capable of delivering the same level of Quantum Yield that High Energy Sulfur Plasma Lights (HESPL) are. (DO NOT confuse these with the Lumix Light Engine driven offerings from Gavita, Chameleon, Topanga and/or Rocket.)
While there is, at present, only one company offering this CERTIFIED Class AAA “Solar Simulator,” and they have priced themselves into unreasonable impracticability for the majority of commercial production facilities, a single 1300 Watt HESPL is easily capable of keeping pace with 3-4 Gavita DE1000HPSPRO, running on overdrive at 480V.
How, if the umol/j of PAR is significantly lower for the 1300 Watt HESPL, can it keep pace with 3450 Watts of one of the best HPS units made? (This applies only slightly less to LEDs.) Since radio is just MUCH slower light, let’s use an electronic instrument–a radio–to demonstrate that what I’m saying is valid.
Start with a station which is properly tuned in. Set the volume so that the music sounds good and the signal is unbroken. To reach your receivers (plants) with unbroken signal, each of the frequencies in the song must be present in the signal which produce each musical note in the song, These must arrive at the correct phase in the rise time/slew rate cycle (In light these happen in increments of 1,000,000,000,000 cycles per second, each cycle being a single Hertz.) and at the proper relative amplitudes (volumes).
Now tune the radio off of the correct tuning, but not so far you lose the signal completely. It sounds shitty and mostly distorted. This is because the signal, has poor “integrity,” generally because of missing frequencies, improper phase coherence and/or improper relative amplitudes. The distortion we’re hearing is the receiver expending energy to re-“gain” signal.
This is the equivalent of most growlights, HID and LED, which doesn’t even have the correct tuning to maximize usability of ePAR (low-frequency {730 nm wavelength}-high frequency {365 nm}.)
Now turn the amplitude (volume) up. MORE of the signal comes through, less, but still badly, distorted. This is the equivalent of the best HIDs (CMH & CHPS) and LEDs with the proper relative levels of red, far red green and blue and some UVA (<380 nm). These are closer to being a properly tuned transmitter for the photobiologically active signals we call 'light."
Now, without lowering the amplitude (Volume) return the tuning to its best position. It sounds as good as it can, but at a higher volume than it started out at. With the right, HESPL, light source you can deliver significantly higher levels of Photo-biologically Active Radiation (PbAR) 780 nm – 280nm wavelength, at the same or lower Watts of electrical input.